File: docs/order-done-plan-01.md
Target version: 1.5.1
Status: Draft / not yet implemented
Supersedes: docs/order-done-plan-00.md (kept for history)
This revision incorporates the findings from the code-review of plan-00. Summary of what changed:
try/catch so one
bad order can no longer fatal the request and strand the whole batch (was: an uncaught
throwable in the loop aborts everything, including WooCommerce's own completion pass).Studiou_DB_Manager::TERMINAL_STATUSES (completed/cancelled/refunded/failed).
This fixes the silent mutation of already-completed orders (whose items lazily default
to pending-print) and resolves the terminal-order question (Q2) toward the plugin's
established skip-terminal philosophy. See §6 for the precise resulting behaviour,
including one honest residual edge case.completed, no "completion blocked" notice) rather than only log-line
ordering, so a future WooCommerce regression in the load-bearing assumption is actually
caught.wc_get_order() instances and why that is
expected to be coherent (and what would break it)./* translators */ comments on every new
string, and §8 states the real new-string count.wc_get_order() loads per
order across the two callbacks.On the HPOS Orders list (wp-admin/admin.php?page=wc-orders), when the operator runs
the built-in WooCommerce bulk action "Change status to Completed"
(mark_completed, Czech "Změnit stav na Dokončeno"), the plugin must — before the
order status is flipped — advance every still-unresolved product line-item print status to
Done Print (done-print) for orders that are actually about to transition.
"Unresolved / unset" means any product item currently in pending-print or in-print.
Items already in done-print or skip-print are left alone. This is exactly the semantics
of the existing Order_Item_Status_Manager::advance_remaining_to_done() — we reuse it, we
do not reimplement it.
This auto-advance is proprietary to this one entry point only:
mark_completed bulk action, andwoocommerce_page_wc-orders (HPOS) screen.It must not fire for:
edit-shop_order) — out of scope; operator uses HPOS.Everywhere else, the existing completion guard behaviour is preserved: completing an order while items are still pending/in-print is blocked and reverted with an admin notice.
Today the only coupling on → wc-completed is the completion guard in
Order_Item_Status_Manager::on_order_status_changed() (hooked to
woocommerce_order_status_changed, priority 5). It does the opposite of what we want here:
if any product item is still pending-print/in-print it reverts the order back to its
previous status and shows an error notice.
So a bulk "mark completed" over orders whose items are still pending currently fails for
those orders — WooCommerce sets them to completed, our guard immediately reverts them, and
the operator sees N "completion blocked" notices. The operator's intent in this specific
bulk action is the reverse: "I'm done — mark the items done and complete the orders."
The fix is to advance the items before the status change reaches the guard, so the guard sees a ready order and lets the completion stand.
WooCommerce routes all orders-list bulk actions — including the core mark_* ones —
through the WordPress filter:
handle_bulk_actions-woocommerce_page_wc-orders ( $redirect_to, $action, $ids )
The plugin already proves this: Bulk_Actions_Manager registers its custom actions on this
exact filter at priority 10 and they work. WooCommerce core's own handler for mark_*
(which loops the selected IDs and calls $order->update_status( 'completed', ... )) is —
on the WooCommerce versions in scope — another callback on the same filter, registered at
priority 10.
Key lever: a callback registered on the same filter at a lower priority number runs first. So a callback at priority 9 runs before WooCommerce changes any status — the exact window we need to advance items.
(Priority is what orders callbacks, not registration time. Our managers register at
plugins_loaded 10; WC registers its list-table handler later in the request during screen
setup. Using priority 9 guarantees we still run first regardless of registration order.)
Load-bearing assumption. The whole feature depends on WC core's
mark_completedhandler being a priority-10 filter callback that priority 9 pre-empts. If a future WC version processesmark_*inline (before applying the filter) the priority-9 window disappears. This is why §9 #8 asserts the actual outcome on the installed WC, and why §7 documents a fallback.
Add one new callback on handle_bulk_actions-woocommerce_page_wc-orders at priority 9
that:
$redirect_to untouched unless $action === 'mark_completed';$redirect_to untouched) if the user lacks edit_shop_orders — let WC's
own handler reject the request; we never mutate without the cap;array_filter(array_map('intval', (array) $ids)));try/catch: wc_get_order($id), skip falsy, skip any order
already in a terminal status (see §6), then call advance_remaining_to_done($order)
(reused as-is);UtilsLog::message(..., 'success') summary across the
batch (e.g. "Auto-advanced 12 items to Done Print across 4 orders before completion.");
if any order threw, emits one warning summarising the failure count;$redirect_to unchanged — it does not short-circuit. WooCommerce's
priority-10 handler then runs the actual status change, and because every item on the
advanced orders is now done-print/skip-print, the completion guard at priority 5 sees
a ready order and lets it through silently.No change is needed to the completion guard itself. The guard stays as the safety net for every other path — and, by design (§6), for the terminal orders we deliberately do not advance.
Put the new hook + handler in Order_Item_Status_Manager (not Bulk_Actions_Manager):
advance_remaining_to_done(), set_status(), get_status(), the
completion guard, and the recursion-guard flag — all the moving parts of this feature are
in one class, so the author reasons about the guard/advance interaction in one place.add_filter(...) line there is idiomatic.Studiou_DB_Manager::TERMINAL_STATUSES — a constant on an always-loaded class — which is
acceptable: Studiou_DB_Manager itself already does new Order_Item_Status_Manager(), so
the two classes are already mutually aware.)Constructor addition:
add_filter(
'handle_bulk_actions-woocommerce_page_wc-orders',
array($this, 'bulk_complete_advance_items'),
9, // before WooCommerce's own mark_completed handler (priority 10)
3
);
New method (sketch — final code to match house style):
/**
* Proprietary behaviour for the HPOS Orders list "Change status to Completed"
* bulk action ONLY: advance every still-pending/in-print product item to
* done-print BEFORE WooCommerce flips the order, so the completion guard is
* satisfied instead of reverting. Runs at priority 9 (before WC's priority-10
* mark_completed handler). Returns the redirect unchanged so WC still performs
* the status change.
*
* Orders already in a terminal status (completed/cancelled/refunded/failed) are
* deliberately NOT advanced — see the class-level coupling notes and
* docs/order-done-plan-01.md §6:
* - already-completed: WC's flip is a no-op, so advancing would silently
* mutate items (and add a misleading note) with no transition;
* - cancelled/refunded/failed with unresolved items: leaving them unadvanced
* lets the existing completion guard revert WC's flip, protecting them from
* being completed by an over-broad selection — matching the protocol-import
* skip-terminal philosophy.
*
* Each order is processed inside try/catch: a single failing order must not
* abort the whole batch (which would also stop WC's priority-10 handler from
* completing ANY order and leave earlier orders with advanced-but-uncompleted
* items).
*/
public function bulk_complete_advance_items($redirect_to, $action, $ids) {
if ($action !== 'mark_completed') {
return $redirect_to;
}
if (!current_user_can('edit_shop_orders')) {
return $redirect_to; // WC's handler enforces caps; we don't mutate without it.
}
$ids = array_filter(array_map('intval', (array) $ids));
if (empty($ids)) {
return $redirect_to;
}
$total_items = 0;
$total_orders = 0;
$failures = 0;
foreach ($ids as $id) {
try {
$order = wc_get_order($id);
if (!$order) {
continue;
}
// Do not touch terminal/already-completed orders (see docblock).
if ($order->has_status(Studiou_DB_Manager::TERMINAL_STATUSES)) {
continue;
}
$advanced = $this->advance_remaining_to_done($order);
if ($advanced > 0) {
$order->add_order_note(sprintf(
/* translators: %d is the number of line items advanced. */
_n(
'%d line item advanced to "Done Print" before bulk completion.',
'%d line items advanced to "Done Print" before bulk completion.',
$advanced,
'studiou-wc-ord-print-statuses'
),
$advanced
));
$total_items += $advanced;
$total_orders++;
}
} catch (\Throwable $e) {
$failures++;
UtilsLog::log(sprintf(
'bulk_complete_advance_items: order #%d failed to pre-advance: %s',
$id,
$e->getMessage()
));
}
}
if ($total_items > 0) {
UtilsLog::message(
sprintf(
/* translators: 1: item count, 2: order count */
__('Auto-advanced %1$d line item(s) to "Done Print" across %2$d order(s) before completion.', 'studiou-wc-ord-print-statuses'),
$total_items,
$total_orders
),
'success'
);
UtilsLog::log(sprintf('bulk mark_completed: advanced %d items across %d orders', $total_items, $total_orders));
}
if ($failures > 0) {
UtilsLog::message(
sprintf(
/* translators: %d is the number of orders that errored during pre-advance. */
_n(
'%d order could not be pre-advanced and may not complete — check the debug log.',
'%d orders could not be pre-advanced and may not complete — check the debug log.',
$failures,
'studiou-wc-ord-print-statuses'
),
$failures
),
'warning'
);
}
return $redirect_to;
}
(\Throwable is available on PHP 7.2+, the plugin's minimum.)
If the team would rather keep all bulk-action hooks in Bulk_Actions_Manager, the
identical logic can live there instead, with the Order_Item_Status_Manager instance
injected via the constructor. The main plugin (initialize_managers()) currently builds
Bulk_Actions_Manager (line ~89) before Order_Item_Status_Manager (line ~92), so this
would also require reordering those two instantiations and passing the item-status manager
into new Bulk_Actions_Manager($itemStatus). Functionally equivalent; more wiring.
Recommendation stays with Order_Item_Status_Manager.
Confirm during implementation:
woocommerce_order_status_changed priority 5; it fires after WC's
bulk handler calls update_status('completed'), i.e. after our priority-9 pre-advance.done-print and saves each one
($item->save());$order->update_status('completed');woocommerce_order_status_changed → guard (priority 5) →
is_order_ready_for_completion() now returns ready → guard returns without reverting.$inside_self_revert recursion flag is not involved (no revert happens), so no
conflict.WC_Order instances — coherency note (review finding)Unlike the Delivered-import path — which advances items and completes on the same
$order object — Approach A inherently involves two different wc_get_order($id)
instances: ours at priority 9 (which advances + saves the item meta) and WooCommerce's own
at priority 10 (which calls update_status and whose object the guard inspects).
This is expected to be coherent because WC_Order_Item::save() writes _print_status to
woocommerce_order_itemmeta and invalidates that item's meta entry in the WP object
cache, so WC's fresh load at priority 10 reads the just-saved done-print value. The risk to
watch: a persistent object cache / order cache layer that returns a stale item-meta view to
the second instance would make the guard still see pending-print and revert — re-producing
exactly the "completion blocked" notices this feature removes. The §9 #8 test asserts the
real outcome precisely to exercise this on the live stack rather than trusting the
invalidation in theory.
(If a future change ever makes this unreliable, the simplest hardening is to advance and complete in a single pass ourselves — but that is the §7 fallback's territory, not Approach A.)
Studiou_DB_Manager::TERMINAL_STATUSES.
Resulting behaviour:
completed (incl. legacy orders created before 1.5.0, whose items lazily
default to pending-print): we do not advance them. WC's update_status('completed')
is a no-op (no transition), so nothing else happens either. This fixes the silent
item-mutation + misleading note that an unconditional advance would cause on
non-transitioning orders.cancelled/refunded/failed with unresolved items: we do not advance them; WC
core still calls update_status('completed'), but the existing completion guard then
reverts the order to its prior status and shows its standard "completion blocked" notice.
Net effect: the order stays terminal — protected from being completed by an over-broad
selection, consistent with how the protocol imports skip TERMINAL_STATUSES.cancelled/refunded/failed order whose product items are
already all done-print/skip-print will pass the guard and will be completed by WC
core. The guard only blocks on unresolved items, never on the order's terminal status, and
Approach A cannot remove IDs from WC's own pass. This matches existing 1.5.0 guard
behaviour (it is not a regression introduced here) but is documented so nobody is
surprised. If full terminal protection is required, it needs the §7 fallback or an
ID-filtering approach, not Approach A. Tracked as Q2.try/catch. A
single order that throws (e.g. a DB error during $item->save()) is logged and counted as
a failure; the loop continues so the rest of the batch is still pre-advanced and WC's
priority-10 pass still runs. Without this, an uncaught throwable would propagate out of the
filter, fatal the request, leave already-processed orders with advanced-but-uncompleted
items, and complete nothing.edit_shop_orders); bail without mutating if
absent rather than wp_die() — WC's handler already enforces caps and we don't want to
change the failure UX of the core action.advance_remaining_to_done() already skips
anything that isn't a WC_Order_Item_Product. No change.advance_remaining_to_done() saves each changed item individually ($item->save()),
consistent with the existing import path — N item-saves for N pending items.If a future WooCommerce version stops routing mark_completed through
handle_bulk_actions-woocommerce_page_wc-orders, or our priority-9 callback cannot be made
to run first, or the two-instance cache coherency in §5 proves unreliable, fall back to
context-aware guard relaxation:
on_order_status_changed(), when $to === 'completed', detect the bulk-complete
request context — is_admin() and the request carries the wc-orders bulk action, e.g.
($_REQUEST['page'] ?? '') === 'wc-orders' and the resolved bulk action
($_REQUEST['action'] / action2) is mark_completed.advance_remaining_to_done($order) and
allow completion. Because this path runs inside the guard on the same $order object WC
is completing, it also sidesteps the two-instance concern in §5.This is more coupled (inspects superglobals inside a domain listener) and is documented here only as a contingency. Verify Approach A on staging first (see §9); prefer it.
includes/class-order-item-status-manager.php
add_filter('handle_bulk_actions-woocommerce_page_wc-orders', ..., 9, 3) in the
constructor;bulk_complete_advance_items() method (with the terminal-skip guard and per-order
try/catch).studiou-wc-ord-print-statuses.php
Version: header and STUDIOU_WC_OPS_VERSION → 1.5.1.README.md
## 1.5.1 changelog entry.CLAUDE.md
Order_Item_Status_Manager architecture bullet with the new bulk-complete
pre-advance hook (priority 9 on handle_bulk_actions-woocommerce_page_wc-orders,
scoped to mark_completed, terminal-skipping, per-order try/catch);- [docs/order-done-plan-01.md](docs/order-done-plan-01.md) — Plan for auto "Done Print" on the HPOS bulk "Change status to Completed" action (1.5.1).New translatable strings (correcting plan-00's undercount — three new source formats, two of them singular/plural pairs):
_n('%d line item advanced to "Done Print" before bulk completion.', …);__('Auto-advanced %1$d line item(s) to "Done Print" across %2$d order(s) before completion.', …);_n('%d order could not be pre-advanced and may not complete — check the debug log.', …).Add their English sources and refresh cs_CZ (docs/translations.txt, languages/*.po/*.mo)
per the existing process. Each _n()/__() call carries a /* translators */ comment in
the sketch — keep them in the final code (matches the existing _n() at
on_order_status_changed()).
Manual, on staging with HPOS enabled and WP_DEBUG/WP_DEBUG_LOG on:
pending-print, in-print, one skip-print). On wp-admin/admin.php?page=wc-orders,
select it, run Change status to Completed. Expect: order becomes completed; the
pending/in items are now done-print; the skip-print item is untouched; one order note
"N line items advanced to Done Print before bulk completion."; one success admin notice;
no "completion blocked" notice.done-print/skip-print → completes with no advance
note (count 0).completed / legacy order (Finding 2): select an order already in
completed whose items are still pending-print (e.g. completed before 1.5.0, lazy
default). Expect: no item mutation, no advance note, no new transition — the
order is left exactly as it was.refunded (or cancelled/failed)
order with pending items. Expect: it is not advanced and is not completed — WC's
flip is reverted by the existing guard and the order stays refunded, with the standard
"completion blocked" notice. (Also note the documented residual edge in §6: a terminal
order whose items are already all resolved will be completed.)edit_shop_orders, confirm no item mutation occurs.Completed, the items are done-print, and no "completion blocked"
notice appears. As supporting evidence, with WP_DEBUG_LOG log the item statuses at the
top of bulk_complete_advance_items() and inside the completion guard and confirm the
advance log line precedes the guard line for the same order in one request. (The
end-state assertion — not just log ordering — is what proves priority 9 actually wins and
that the guard's order instance observed the saved meta. Re-check after any WC upgrade.)Order_Item_Status_Manager (recommended) or move
to Bulk_Actions_Manager with dependency injection (requires reordering manager
instantiation)? Default: Order_Item_Status_Manager.cancelled/refunded/failed with unresolved items
the existing guard reverts WC's completion, so they stay terminal; the one residual edge
(terminal order with already-resolved items still completes) is documented and would need
the §7 fallback / ID-filtering to close. If the team instead wants the original
"follow core, complete everything" behaviour, remove the TERMINAL_STATUSES skip — but
that re-introduces the silent refunded→completed + item-advance risk the review flagged.edit-shop_order screen is genuinely out of
scope (operator uses HPOS only). If it must be covered too, mirror the hook on
handle_bulk_actions-edit-shop_order.